Jean Stars at Edmonds' Driftwood Players

Jean was elegant and polished as Mildred, the wife of Guy Montag, in Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451. The story made me cry because it was such an accurate prophecy of America today.

The review from My Edmonds News included these items:

"As an explanation of how “the system” came to replace self-determination with low-intellect entertainment, protagonist “Beatty,” the fire chief of the book burners (played by Apostolos Gliarmis), observes in a cat-and-mouse exchange with Montag (Ryan St. John) and Montag’s wife (Jean E. Sleight) – while peering through smoke rings created by his pipe smoke:"

“Picture it [Montag], 19th-century man with his horses, dogs, carts, slow motion. Then, in the 20th century, speed up your camera. Books cut shorter; condensations, digests, tabloids. Everything boils down to the gag, the snap ending."

“Classics cut to fit 15-minute radio shows, then cut again to fill a two-minute book column, winding up at last as a 10- or 12-line dictionary resume. I exaggerate, of course. The dictionaries were for reference. But many were those whose sole knowledge of Hamlet (you know the title certainly, Montag; it is probably only a faint rumor of a title to you, Mrs. Montag) whose sole knowledge, as I say, of Hamlet was a one-page digest in a book that claimed: now at least you can read all the classics; keep up with your neighbors. Do you see? Out of the nursery into the college and back to the nursery; there’s your intellectual pattern for the past five centuries or more.”

And further on . . .

"Jaquith (the Director) manages a string of pathos scenes that reflect just how normalized insanity can become. The gleam in Mrs. Montag’s eyes as she hears her own name intoned over the all-pervading television show meant to divert the intellect of housewives; the jock-like “we win” behavior of the medics who save Mrs. Montag from her accidental suicide attempt – and so many other scenes “normalized” in a craven dystopia.

The cast in The Players production of Fahrenheit 451 deserves, on whole and without exception, a standing ovation. This reviewer likes to watch the supporting actors’ ability to stay in character as main characters deliver monologues. It’s noteworthy to see the level of respect and interest shown to all on the Wade James stage."

Nathanael to Move in November

Nathanael graciously helped with the $5,000 plus half-yearly property taxes with a $4,000 donation in lieu of rent. 

He will move to the Grammercy Apartments in Renton in early November and begin to prepare for his new married life.  Wedding plans continue on schedule, even if my weight loss is behind schedule.  If I don't fit into the coat, perhaps I can still fit into the vest.  Invitations have been sent, and I'll be taking December 14-16 off to travel to Oregon with Nathanael before the wedding on the 17th.

Construction Begins at NE 10th St. and 100th Avenue NE

At the end of September, the long-standing 24 unit Sumiyoshi Apartments were demolished.

Continental Properties plans to redevelop the property into a new 5-story all-residential building with approximately 135 units and 199 below-grade parking spaces. The new building will include a rooftop deck with barbecues and views of the  downtown Bellevue skyline.

How it impacts the view from 1228 99th Ave. NE will be an interesting discovery, and what it does to traffic.

“Politics: the art of using euphemisms, lies, emotionalism and fear-mongering
to dupe average people into accepting--or even demanding--their own enslavement.”

― Larken Rose

Voting for President?  Maybe Not.

The choice between candidates for U.S. President in 2016 is one between a wicked person and a foolish person.  I have been studying Ecclesiastes this month and the Preacher there contrasts the wicked with the righteous, and the foolish with the wise.  Choosing not to vote is in itself an empty gesture, because living as we do in a very "blue" state, it is clear that Washington will be captured by Hillary Clinton.  I cannot support such an evil person.  On the other hand, Donald Trump has proven himself a fool and thus a real danger to the country.  Even though he might lean more to the conservative side, a man is known by his words and deeds.  Andy Crouch of Christianity Today speaks my mind in his article below.  But so does Eric Metaxas in his opinion piece from the Wall Street Journal below that.   [ Bottom line:  I would hate to vote for Trump, but I could never vote for Hillary. ]

Speak Truth to Trump                   

Evangelicals, of all people, should not be silent about Donald Trump's blatant immorality.

Andy Crouch / Christianity Today / October 10, 2016

As a non-profit journalistic organization, Christianity Today is doubly committed to staying neutral regarding political campaigns—the law requires it, and we serve our readers best when we give them the information and analysis they need to make their own judgments.  We can never collude when idolatry becomes manifest, especially when it demands our public allegiance.

Just because we are neutral, however, does not mean we are indifferent. We are especially not indifferent when the gospel is at stake. The gospel is of infinitely greater importance than any campaign, and one good summary of the gospel is, “Jesus is Lord.”

The true Lord of the world reigns even now, far above any earthly ruler. His kingdom is not of this world, but glimpses of its power and grace can be found all over the world. One day his kingdom, and his only, will be the standard by which all earthly kingdoms are judged, and following that judgment day, every knee will bow, in heaven, on earth, and under the earth, as his reign is fully realized in the renewal of all things.

The lordship of Christ places constraints on the way his followers involve themselves, or entangle themselves, with earthly rulers.

On the one hand, we pray for all rulers—and judging from the example of Old Testament exiles like Daniel and New Testament prisoners like Paul, we can even wholeheartedly pray for rulers who directly oppose our welfare. On the other hand, we recognize that all earthly governments partake, to a greater or lesser extent, in what the Bible calls idolatry: substituting the creation for the Creator and the earthly ruler for the true God.

No human being, including even the best rulers, is free of this temptation. But some rulers and regimes are especially outrageous in their God-substitution. After Augustus Caesar, the emperors of Rome became more and more elaborate in their claims of divinity with each generation—and more and more ineffective in their governance. Communism aimed not just to replace faith in anything that transcended the state, but to crush it. Such systems do not just dishonor God, they dishonor his image in persons, and in doing so they set themselves up for dramatic destruction. We can never collude when such idolatry becomes manifest, especially when it demands our public allegiance. Christians in every place and time must pray for the courage to stay standing when the alleged “voice of a god, not a man” commands us to kneel.

This year’s presidential election in the United States presents Christian voters with an especially difficult choice.

The Democratic nominee has pursued unaccountable power through secrecy—most evidently in the form of an email server designed to shield her communications while in public service, but also in lavishly compensated speeches, whose transcripts she refuses to release, to some of the most powerful representatives of the world system. She exemplifies the path to power preferred by the global technocratic elite—rooted in a rigorous control of one’s image and calculated disregard for norms that restrain less powerful actors. Such concentration of power, which is meant to shield the powerful from the vulnerability of accountability, actually creates far greater vulnerabilities, putting both the leader and the community in greater danger.

But because several of the Democratic candidate’s policy positions are so manifestly incompatible with Christian reverence for the lives of the most vulnerable, and because her party is so demonstrably hostile to expressions of traditional Christian faith, there is plenty of critique and criticism of the Democratic candidate from Christians, including evangelical Christians.

But not all evangelical Christians—in fact, alas, most evangelical Christians, judging by the polls—have shown the same critical judgment when it comes to the Republican nominee. True, when given a choice, primary voters who claimed evangelical faith largely chose other candidates. But since his nomination, Donald Trump has been able to count on “the evangelicals” (in his words) for a great deal of support.

The revelations of the past week of his vile and crude boasting about sexual conquest—indeed, sexual assault—might have been shocking, but they should have surprised no one.

This past week, the latest (though surely not last) revelations from Trump’s past have caused many

evangelical leaders to reconsider. This is heartening, but it comes awfully late. What Trump is, everyone has known and has been able to see for decades, let alone the last few months. The revelations of the past week of his vile and crude boasting about sexual conquest—indeed, sexual assault—might have been shocking, but they should have surprised no one.

Indeed, there is hardly any public person in America today who has more exemplified the “earthly nature” (“flesh” in the King James and the literal Greek) that Paul urges the Colossians to shed: “sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires, and greed, which is idolatry” (3:5). This is an incredibly apt summary of Trump’s life to date. Idolatry, greed, and sexual immorality are intertwined in individual lives and whole societies. Sexuality is designed to be properly ordered within marriage, a relationship marked by covenant faithfulness and profound self-giving and sacrifice. To indulge in sexual immorality is to make oneself and one’s desires an idol. That Trump has been, his whole adult life, an idolater of this sort, and a singularly unrepentant one, should have been clear to everyone.

And therefore it is completely consistent that Trump is an idolater in many other ways. He has given no evidence of humility or dependence on others, let alone on God his Maker and Judge. He wantonly celebrates strongmen and takes every opportunity to humiliate and demean the vulnerable. He shows no curiosity or capacity to learn. He is, in short, the very embodiment of what the Bible calls a fool.

Some have compared Trump to King David, who himself committed adultery and murder. But David’s story began with a profound reliance on God who called him from the sheepfold to the kingship, and by the grace of God it did not end with his exploitation of Bathsheba and Uriah. There is no parallel in Trump’s much more protracted career of exploitation. The Lord sent his word by the prophet Nathan to denounce David’s actions—alas, many Christian leaders who could have spoken such prophetic confrontation to him personally have failed to do so. David quickly and deeply repented, leaving behind the astonishing and universally applicable lament of his own sin in Psalm 51—we have no sign that Trump ever in his life has expressed such humility. And the biblical narrative leaves no doubt that David’s sin had vast and terrible consequences for his own family dynasty and for his nation. The equivalent legacy of a Trump presidency is grievous to imagine.

Most Christians who support Trump have done so with reluctant strategic calculation, largely based on the president’s power to appoint members of the Supreme Court. Important issues are indeed at stake, including the right of Christians and adherents of other religions to uphold their vision of sexual integrity and marriage even if they are in the cultural minority.

But there is a point at which strategy becomes its own form of idolatry—an attempt to manipulate the levers of history in favor of the causes we support. Strategy becomes idolatry, for ancient Israel and for us today, when we make alliances with those who seem to offer strength—the chariots of Egypt, the vassal kings of Rome—at the expense of our dependence on God who judges all nations, and in defiance of God’s manifest concern for the stranger, the widow, the orphan, and the oppressed. Strategy becomes idolatry when we betray our deepest values in pursuit of earthly influence. And because such strategy requires capitulating to idols and princes and denying the true God, it ultimately always fails.

Enthusiasm for a candidate like Trump gives our neighbors ample reason to doubt that we believe Jesus is Lord. They see that some of us are so self-interested, and so self-protective, that we will ally ourselves with someone who violates all that is sacred to us—in hope, almost certainly a vain hope given his mendacity and record of betrayal, that his rule will save us.

Andy Crouch is executive editor of Christianity Today.